It’s not often a gaming company responds to criticism in such an awesome and heartwarming way. For every ‘embrace your inner-geek’ speech la Metzen there is a casual dismissal of concerns (again, a’la Metzen.) For Blizzard to remove Real ID from the forums took the impassioned responses of thousands upon thousands of users, for example. Their track record is not brilliant.
So when a game company posts something like the following on their forums, I sit up and take notice. I’ve never played a Bioware game properly, but right now I’m considering shelling out for several simply because I want to give my money to a game company that doesn’t dismiss the concerns of fans who want more from their games than adolescent fantasies and objectification.
To the issue: I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again– perhaps a bit more eloquently, since it’s apparently of dire concern to some.
The romances in the game are not for “the straight male gamer”. They’re for everyone. We have a lot of fans, many of whom are neither straight nor male, and they deserve no less attention. We have good numbers, after all, on the number of people who actually used similar sorts of content in DAO and thus don’t need to resort to anecdotal evidence to support our idea that their numbers are not insignificant… and that’s ignoring the idea that they don’t have just as much right to play the kind of game they wish as anyone else. The “rights” of anyone with regards to a game are murky at best, but anyone who takes that stance must apply it equally to both the minority as well as the majority. The majority has no inherent “right” to get more options than anyone else.
More than that, I would question anyone deciding they speak for “the straight male gamer” just as much as someone claiming they speak for “all RPG fans”, “all female fans” or even “all gay fans”. You don’t. If you wish to express your personal desires, then do so. I have no doubt that any opinion expressed on these forums is shared by many others, but since none of them have elected a spokesperson you’re better off not trying to be one. If your attempt is to convince BioWare developers, I can tell you that you do in fact make your opinion less convincing by doing so.
And if there is any doubt why such an opinion might be met with hostility, it has to do with privilege. You can write it off as “political correctness” if you wish, but the truth is that privilege always lies with the majority. They’re so used to being catered to that they see the lack of catering as an imbalance. They don’t see anything wrong with having things set up to suit them, what’s everyone’s fuss all about? That’s the way it should be, any everyone else should be used to not getting what they want.
The truth is that making a romance available for both genders is far less costly than creating an entirely new one. Does it create some issues of implementation? Sure– but anything you try on this front is going to have its issues, and inevitably you’ll always leave someone out in the cold. In this case, are all straight males left out in the cold? Not at all. There are romances available for them just the same as anyone else. Not all straight males require that their content be exclusive, after all, and you can see that even on this thread.
Would I do it again? I don’t know. I doubt I would have Anders make the first move again– at the time, I thought that requiring all romances to have Hawke initiate everything was the unrealistic part. Even if someone decides that this makes everyone “unrealistically” bisexual, however, or they can’t handle the idea that the character might be bisexual if they were another PC… I don’t see that as a big concern, to be honest. Romances are never one-size-fits-all, and even for those who don’t mind the sexuality issue there’s no guarantee they’ll find a character they even want to romance. That’s why romances are optional content. It’s such a personal issue that we’ll never be able to please everyone. The very best we can do is give everyone a little bit of choice, and that’s what we tried here.
And the person who says that the only way to please them is to restrict options for others is, if you ask me, the one who deserves it least. And that’s my opinion, expressed as politely as possible.
In a wall of text. Sorry about that.
And I’m sorry if someone didn’t get everything they wanted out of the romances– as I always am. I wish we could do the ideal where there’s something for every desire and opinion, but as usual we make do.
- David Gaider – Lead Writer Dragon Age 2/Dragon Age Origins
This is a start. It’s a long road, and I doubt it will ever be 100% in my life time, but it’s amazing to see such common sense as the official line from a developer, and such a successful one to boot. I keep my fingers crossed that this will ripple out. I’m under no illusions that this will change the minds of the vast majority of the gaming industry, but if there is even one small corner where this attitude prevails, my day just got a bit brighter.






1
Erica at http://diaryofagamergirl.blogspot.com/
This is impressive to me as well … it’s good to know that some kind of official statement has come out of any game designer on such a “touchy” subject … and at least everyone is starting to realize that it’s not just straight males that play and contribute to the gaming industry … on the flip side it also sucks to be pigeon-holed as a female into your game types being bejeweled, tetris and sudoku … and hearing people say that Nintendo is geared toward “women & younger players” while the XBox, PS3 and PC games are geared toward “men & teenage boys” … which has been a common thing lately … I am glad to hear that one part of the gaming industry is not pigeon-holing anyone!
Posted at March 23, 2011 on 2:42pm.
2
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
@Erica – Yeah. I find it hilarious how disdainful some people are of things like Tetris – that was a classic, iconic game so to see such games dismissed, AND THEN that women only play certain types of games is …urgh. Many women =/= all women, and neither are they the only players of such games.
The only thing I was disappointed in was his use of Tone Argument, but unfortunately that is par for the course when it comes to corporate forums.
Posted at March 23, 2011 on 3:03pm.
3
Spinks at http://www.spinksville.com
Good for Bioware!
I’m mulling over Gaider’s comment about thinking it was a mistake to have Anders flirt with you first (how many straight guys do you think would have complained if it had been Isabela who took that role?) because I kind of agree with him, it is a bit fake if your PC is always the one initiating the romances … and sometimes it’s just nice to be flirted with.
Posted at March 23, 2011 on 8:16pm.
4
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
@Spinks – That’s a good point – we get so used to thinking of the player as the one with the ‘agency’ or ability to initiate these things, but part of building a world is building the characters, and characters DO things, including romantic/sexual things so…yeah.
It is nice to be flirted with sometimes
Posted at March 23, 2011 on 8:22pm.
5
Chastity at http://www.righteousorbs.com
While I’m generally quite a big fan of Gaider and I do think this is (in some ways) a step in the right direction, I’m not entirely certain that ticking the bisexuality box on all the NPCs is the same as making the romances “for everyone”. I think there’s quite an important difference between a gay romance option and a romance option designed with a gay audience in mind.
I mean I could be wrong, but I don’t actually think that the hot bisexual pirate captain was designed without at least *one* eye on the fact that a lot of their straight male target demographic would be really into the idea of a hot bisexual pirate captain.
Ironically I’d say the one element of the DAII romances which really *does* stand up and say “this game wasn’t designed exclusively for heterosexual men” is the one element that Gaider says he’d change: having Anders hit on the PC despite the fact that it could conceivably make straight male players uncomfortable.
There’s also an extent to which making everybody “bisexual” (or as I believe Gaider puts it giving NPCs context-sensitive sexuality) is that you actually erase sexuality entirely. In Dragon Age: Origins, the gay romance options felt like they had quite strongly articulated sexual identities (Zhevran was a bit of a stereotype but that’s beside the point). Making everybody bisexual runs the risk of making everybody straight-but-making-an-exception, which is not necessarily the place you want to be in.
From a game design, player choice viewpoint, it’s the right thing to do, but I don’t think it’s quite the blow for equality people are making it out to be.
Sorry, that got long.
Posted at March 25, 2011 on 11:39pm.
6
Brangwen at http://nonelitistraiding.blogspot.com
@Chastity – (as usual) I really 100% agree with you about the Anders comment. It was something I LOVED about the game, it made the relationships seem more real (and Anders is made of win, but that’s another topic entirely). I love that Anders makes a move, and you have to deal with the fact that he is a moody, cant-not-take-things-personally kind of guy. There’s no win there if you want to reject him. Sometimes, life is like that.
@Pewter, I really recommend you save up your bikkies and get this on Steam. Make time to play all the main content. You will not regret it. I might be *cough* playing it in preference to WoW at the moment *whistles innocently*.
DA:II is, for me, the best game I have played so far, and the relationships are 70% of that. I am as straight as they come (I made myself have a gay relationship with Zev in DA:O to experience more of the game – I am struggling with the idea of doing it in DA:II on my third run through, But I will!! Damnitall) but, being the token straight girl in my friendship group (heh, and at least one of my female friends has tried to get me in bed), I have a reputation to uphold
Posted at March 27, 2011 on 11:35pm.
7
redcow at http://redcowrise.blogspot.com
I was pretty happy to read this, for basically all the reasons you bolded. I mean, he dropped the “P” word! He acknowledged that not all gamers are of one type, and that one person cannot hope to accurately represent others he assumes are like him! This has honestly made me think about expanding my game library
Posted at March 29, 2011 on 8:09am.