In lieu of a proper post, I present to you a couple of items from the Cataclysm build. One that is celebratory, and one that is quite frankly odd, and a couple of others. There are spoilers for Dwarf Cataclysm Lore and Archaeology in this post.
I’ve been trying to write an article about my beloved Moira Thaurissan for about 2 months now. One of the few dwarf women NPCs, and the only major lore NPC with a body shape anywhere near mine, she is an interesting character to me, as she fills the most traditional of stereotypes and archetypes for women – the daughter, the damsel in distress, the rebel princess, and possibly a star-crossed lover as well. The new Archaeology profession reveals some beautiful titbits of lore and minor stories, and some wonderful items from days gone by.
How did she embarass him exactly?
First I want to talk about Keelin Stonekeeper. She is not a known NPC in the game, and ‘Bryher Stonekeeper’ doesn’t exist either, but the flavour text tells a tale of woe.
According to legend, Bryher Stonekeeper ran a prosperous tavern near Loch Modan. His daughter, Keelin, travelled far from home, eventually developing the kind of reputation that embarrased her father. Bryher made a deal with a gnome warlock to keep his daughter close to home. The warlock turned Keelin into a hearthstone, so that she would always return to the inn. – The Innkeeper’s Daughter
What. ‘The kind of reputation that embarrassed her father‘. And for that she’s turned into a Hearthstone? The likelihood is that this is just a legend, but at the same time it is an example of Azerothian attitudes towards female sexuality, and the powers and expectations of family. Seriously creeped out by this item, poor Keelin. It might also be a morality tale in that Bryher made a deal with a ‘fallen’ agent, a warlock (and a gnome!) And the gnome tricked poor Bryher, so that he has lost his daughter truly and forever. I don’t feel all that sad for Bryher though, I’m going to continue feeling sad for Keelin.
Now, this could easily be a human tale, and it is practically an Aesop’s Fable, added to the general trope of ‘tavern wenches’ (a phrase which is practically synonymous with whore, slut or prostitute in many fantasy books.) Does it really tell us anything about dwarf society? Possibly not, but we have very few clues to go on if you discount the number of minor female NPCs out there (as the numbers of women in all professions in World of Warcraft are not reflected in the novels, nor in the ‘leadership’ of factions in the World of Warcraft over all.) The only other ‘famous’ female dwarf is Modgud, and a minor character who appeared in the novel covering the War of Three Hammers.
And Moira?
What does this have to do with Moira? Well it serves to illustrate the attitudes to women and female sexuality within Dwarfish society. In general women are characterised as brave and headstrong – part of Moira’s tale is that she actually volunteers to help the people of Redridge – she is ‘captured’ by the Dark Irons in the Burning Steppes under mysterious circumstances. It is suspected to be an inside job, but the only suspects are the Captain of her Guard and Moira herself.
An adventuring party sets out to save her, assured by Magni that her words and loyalty to Dagrun are driven by an enchantment, but when Dagrun is killed, Moira reveals her pregnancy to the party. She shows no inclination to return to Ironforge. For all of Magni’s heartache, this is a woman who is doing what she wants to do and be damned what the men want. At the same time she is using her pregnancy and her position in the grand tradition of royal women down the centuries – she is doing to exercise power one of the few ways she can as a non-combatant woman in a clearly patriarchal society.
Moira and Politics
Princess Moira Bronzebeard becames Dowager Empress Moira Thaurissan. Cataclysm rolls around and she, and her son, are now seated in Magni’s old throne. I won’t dwell on what has happened to Magni, but The Council of Three Hammers now rules Khaz Modan. Moira is not present as the Bronzebeard representative though, she is there to represent the Dark Irons. Upon Dagrun’s death, Moira maintained that he was a good and honourable man, so peace amongst the dwarf clans seems a possibility if she wants to reconcile her Bronzebeard and Thaurissan kin.
She shares the Council with Muradin Bronzebeard and Kurdran Wildhammer ((It used to be Falstad, but Kurdran has apparently returned from Outland to act as representative for the Wildhammer, while Falstad remains in Aerie Peak as High Thane of the Wildhammer.)) Now, it remains to be seen how the Council will function or what unrest the presence of Dark Iron mage trainers will sow, but Moira Thaurissan is a determined woman. I can’t imagine that she will be horde friendly, and from what I read of the Horde Moira/Dagrun quest it seems that she may well bear a grudge against the horde for endangering Emperor Dagrun as well. Was she a headstrong girl going after love, with little thought to the politics, or is she a woman with a vision of what the Dwarf Kingdoms could be?
Dwarven Women – Chaste Warriors
Now, of all the supposedly egalitarian societies, the Dwarven Nations are possibly the most patriarchal in the Alliance. Empress Regent Moira Thaurissan cannot inherit in her own right, she is simply the Regent until her son is deemed old enough to inherit. Dark Iron females are not found amongst the soldiery of Blackrock, they are only found as civilian NPCs, or healers and sorcerers.
On the one hand they are the comical tavern wenches of Warcraft, embarrassing and treacherous ((Moira’s liason with Emperor Thaurissan is viewed as treason, so the only way for Magni to reconcile this is to believe Moira was raped and brainwashed.)) daughters and on the other they are Empresses that adore dragons, and participate as warriors in important ceremonies ((It will be interesting to see what this ‘sword dance’ dance actually looks like – a mock battle, or simply a dance for the entertainment of the viewer – I imagine the latter.)) . This is a very common archtype – the virginal warrior, the sword sister. More complicated (and often subverted) that I’m choosing to explore here.
Moira and Motherhood
I think Moira also represents our only ‘young mother’ in the game. Aegwynn is the other famous example, and Garona the more recent one. Although characterisations of Aegwynn as ‘young’ are extremely wide of the mark, Moira has had a very long gestational period, and is now the only active lore character with a young infant. He is heir to two Dwarf thrones, and thus the closest to a High King since Anvilmar himself. Fenran represents yet another ‘mixed race’ character, and already in-game we see examples of racial prejudice against him from both the Dark Irons and Bronzebeard.
As a mother Moira is fiercely protective of her son, and strong willed enough to lead a faction of the Dark Irons, despite not being Dark Iron herself. She both uses him to establish her own claim to power, and to protect his own future. Royalty is often a dangerous thing to be – even if Fenran chose to forgo both thrones in the future, his life would still be in danger from others attempting to secure the succession for a candidate of their choosing.
Nevermind that Moira could rule as the only living child of Magni, or that she could marry a Bronzebeard and have her second child rule the Bronzebeards. A ‘mother’ is both what she is, and how she maintains her status in dwarf society as a widow. Now her virginity is lost, her power as a Princess of the Bronzebeards is forfeit until Muradin Bronzebeard manages to look beyond what she has done, and starts to see her for the person she is.
For the good of who?
It is also debatable about what being best for her son also being the best for the people she rules. From the little dialogue we have, it seems as though she is very strongly concerned with her son’s birthright. She is not viewed well by her co-rulers, due to the division of her adopted people, but Moira is a person who had the love of her life murdered indirectly by her father. She has been somewhat disowned by the Bronzebeards and her position (and that of her son’s) is tenuous within the Dark Irons. Is she thinking purely along the lines of survival, or is she thinking for the greater good of her people.
I find it interesting that her motives in wanting her son to rule are questioned, when Magni’s motivations for casting off his daughter are not. Is it really in the ‘best interests of the people’ that he disown his heir, or that he strive to keep his only Grandson from the throne, all for the sins of the child’s other grandfather – the Sorcerer-Thane Thaurisan (not Dagrun Thaurissan) who summoned Raganaros. The action that resulted in the enslavement of the Dark Irons is not the fault of the enslaved people. Perhaps this is a time to re-evaluate the Dark Irons as ‘the Bad Guys’, in the same way that the Defias move so close to the line between ‘good’ and ‘evil’.
A Mixed Message
Dwarfen women are expected to fight and do all the dirty work alongside the men. Dwarfen women are amongst the most practical (and awesome) women you will meet as you quest. And yet they are expected to be chaste and obedient to their fathers, and cannot directly participate in rulership except by proxy. Empress Zoe, apropos of the past, is an anomaly in a Dwarfen history which is dominated by the actions of men ((There are multiple references to different dwarfen kings in the Archaeology items list so far)) . Where Empress Zoe may well have been Elizabeth I, Moira Thaurissan currently seems more connected to Eleanor of Aquitaine or Elizabeth Wydeville – occupied with the power of her husbands and her sons, exercising her power through her men. Moira Thaurissan is thus the embodiment of the traditional idea of woman’s power in a monarchial and patriarchal society. The wishes of the Dark Irons (and even of Dagrun) are not really known – they are a people displaced from their home, and firmly under the thumb of Ragnaros. In Cataclysm, the Dark Irons are actually a divided faction, with Moira leading a group of them back into the arms of the Alliance.
For us common dwarfs, the message of the Innkeeper’s Daughter is that ‘sexual liberation’ does not come along with the responsibilities conferred on dwarf women by being allowed to take up arms. For a brisk and practical people, many of the themes in ‘dwarf society’ (in other games/fantasy worlds) tend to revolve around children being born rarely, or courtship being a difficult and slow process due to the similarities between the genders, or even just because dwarf women are disinclined to be motherly. ((Pratchett parodies this excellently, for his dwarf language doesn’t even have a ‘female’ pronoun, and Discworld dwarfs talking in Morporkian default to male pronouns.))
Both Moira and Keelin are ‘embarassing’ daughters and appear as causes of heartache and tragedy for their male relatives. Keelin will be forever silent, but it will be interesting to continue to hear Moira’s voice in the future of the dwarves, and in her own story. Blizzard tend to paint all their characters with broad strokes, but for the women there is less of a range of archetypes, and I’m not particularly optimistic that they’ll actually take Moira anywhere beyond her current ambiguous state. Will she actually play a part in dwarf politics, or will the next expansion be an exercise in continuing the silent motherhood that began 5 years ago in Blackrock Depths?







1
Suicidal Zebra at http://suicidalzebra.blogspot.com
Interesting article.
I think it’s worth mentioning that as an archaeological discovery, The Inkeepers’ Daughter is a reflection of Dwarven past rather than the current state of affairs. Furthermore as legends go it’s just the sort of whimsical explanation of a Hearthstones’ origins I’d expect from a primitive culture. I agree that whilst there are plenty of other interpretations of “kind of reputation” and yours’ is probably what’s intended, legends may exist to this day but have only a negligible their impact on societies.
The issue of Moira is more convoluted, from my point of view the strained Moira/Magni relationship is more overtly an issue of tribalism, and I don’t perceive xenophobia to be solely an expression of patriarchal power. The idea of the Council is to form a balanced leadership for all Dwarves rather than three disparate and competing factions. She should in theory be the heir to the Ironforge Dwarves through her father but has obviously chosen to stay with the Dark Irons, perhaps fearing for her half-Dark Iron child. It would be strange indeed for her to be Empress – monarchical societies very rarely allow for Consorts to take the throne (whatever their gender) for a myriad of reasons – and hence Regency until the child’s majority was always going to be on the cards unless she had enough popular support to declare herself Empress and make it stick. In a non-patriarchal monarchy (where the heir is whomever is born first, regardless of gender) the same outcome is equally likely: marriage would be unlikely to confer more-than-Consort status. I think her position on the Council is the only possible position which ring’s true whilst still drawing from what we understand to be monarchical norms.
As for the last, I’m not really comfortable commenting on wider Dwarven gender issues. I feel that I don’t really have a good overview of any societies within Warcraft because I’m limited by a storyline which only tends to give us a snap-shot of particular groups when a functioning society is much more than that. I think that WoW gender norms are probably closer to today’s progressive democracies than true pre-industrial nations, but that’s supposing an awful lot between the lines. And whilst Moira and Keelin are both female figures bringing heartache to their fathers I think it’s worth remembering that the boys of Warcraft also disappoint (to put it mildly) their fathers; plus there aren’t exactly a lot of mothers kicking around to disappoint.
Posted at September 14, 2010 on 4:45pm.
2
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
@Suicidal Zebra I fixed your html for you.
Posted at September 14, 2010 on 4:54pm.
3
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
To respond to your actual points
1) The NPCs doing everything and having the same stats regardless of gender reflects our modern social norms.
2) The storylines, frankly, don’t.
And I’m not saying that son’s don’t disappoint as well. This is not a gendered discussion about men, but as far as dwarfen women go in major lore storylines, these are all we have. Muradin is a character who is cast in his own right, as is Magni, as is Bran. They may be brothers, but they are whole characters with interesting storylines of their own. Perhaps Dagrun is a disappointing son to Thaurisan, who knows
But we’re not talking about the male characters here, or saying they have it better.
The Chalice and the Innkeeper’s Daughter represent the past, but when you think of female reputations and ‘honor killings’ and the virulance sometimes directed at Jaina simply for having a few different love interests, it remains pretty relevant. I also suggest reading the Door Knocker text
Posted at September 14, 2010 on 5:01pm.
4
Charles at http://wowhats.wordpress.com/
Since the introduction of the Varian Wrynn/Garrosh Hellscream conflict in LK – and that in the context of the “wtf?” argent tournament totally ruining the character of Tirion Fordring for some – I’ve found it really difficult to take Blizzard’s characters generously. Fair dos, they have got fairly complicated backstories to “justify” the way they end up, but if the company thinks that achieving a desired effect in-game (e.g. Alliance vs Horde hostility) is worth sacrificing characterisation to (by making Garrosh and Wrynn seem monstrously unsympathetic and foolish to all but the most careful investigators) then it’s very hard for me to look at a “secondary” character like Moira and credit the writers with any subtlety or clever intent.
I realise this is probably just me working out a grudge against the way Garrosh and Wrynn were presented, but I think the onus is on Blizzard to prove their characters have merit rather than for me to see the merit they think is there. Hence I’m tending towards perceiving characters like Moira in a negative light because, to me, that’s how the game presents her. So when I do work through the new storylines in-game at last I’ll be interested to see if it changes my perceptions.
I just hope it doesn’t come down to how much generosity I’m prepared to afford Blizzard’s writing staff.
Posted at September 14, 2010 on 5:06pm.
5
Rades at http://orcisharmyknife.com
Really interesting article about Moira! Her storyline, and the dwarven political complexities in Cataclysm is one of the aspects of the game I am most looking forward to. The twist when you “rescue” was always DELICIOUSLY foreshadowing, and I’ve been waiting for this storyline to come to fruition.
Even though she is not *truly* ruler of the Dark Irons, I expect that for the entirety of Cataclysm (at least) she will be for all purposes their representative. I personally suspect that she’s sharper and more devious than anyone lets on, and she’ll be using her son, and her “unofficial yet official” position to wreak inner havoc amongst the dwarves – much like Onyxia did as Lady Prestor. After all, in Cataclysm dwarves will be able to be mages and warlocks – formerly two “Dark Iron only” vocations. I think these are two strong indications that Moira’s presence representing the Dark Irons will be very heavily felt and her role significant.
Incidentally, is there any indication of how old her son is? There could be some interesting interactions between her son and the other Regal Child, Anduin.
Is her motivations for peace? Or vengeance for the Dark Irons for the ancient grudges of the past? Regardless, it’s another female character in a position of authority, and with Magatha making moves over in Thunder Bluff, there’s a bit more equality coming into the WoW leadership scene, which is nice to see.
I do disagree with you about the Innkeeper’s Daughter though and its significance. I think it’s a bit of a stretch to assume that Keelin’s behavior was necessarily related at all to being female. Instead, I think it focuses on the typical father-daughter relationship of guardianship and paternal concern. It could easily have been a male child (and likely a mother instead of father, to maintain the classic parent-child bond) who shames his parent through despicable behavior. To use a real-life analogy, I think it’s no different than a teenager going away to college and embarassing his or her parents through drunken debauchery and mischief – regardless of gender. I don’t think there’s enough in that little story to reach the conclusion that it was Keelin’s sexual deeds that shamed her father.
Posted at September 14, 2010 on 8:32pm.
6
red cow at http://redcowrise.blogspot.com/
I’m really glad to see this explanation of the rescuing Moira quest. I admit that I did it a long time ago on my horde main and didn’t read the quest text TOO carefully, so when we finally saved her and she was like “Oh no you killed my lover!!” my reaction was to think that she had been brainwashed SO FAR as to actually care about the guy (rather than care about him genuinely without brainwashing). So I’m glad to see this and put my creeped-out feelings to rest. Dwarves are definitely awesome but sadly I don’t spend enough Alliance side to interact with them. As far as Moira’s influence on Cataclysm politics goes…I don’t have too high hopes. As Charles says, I’m mildly disappointed in the general storytelling of WOW and I can definitely see her being trotted out when it’s vaguely relevant to a plot point and then retired to a plotless existence of milling about in IF when it’s not. Furthermore, I think the vaguely relevant plot points will be restricted to baby-related politics.
To comment on Rades last paragraph, I think it’s very significant that the story is about a father and daughter. I think based on current western cultural narratives, fathers being sweet on their children is presented as kind of unusual, and especially when it’s a daughter rather than a son. The obvious relationships would be mother and any of her children, or father and his son. So this relationship is definitely presented in the context of gruff daddy concerned over his sweet angel daughter. The overprotectiveness comes across to me as that “sweet” but in reality irritating and limiting trope wherein a father declares that he will protect his daughter from all the men she may ever want to date. (Perhaps this has happened to you, or maybe you have seen it happen with a sister or other relative? It’s certainly happened to me.) As we can see in the legend, what comes across as protective is in fact controlling, and in the end the daughter is turned into an easily manipulatable inanimate object. As an aside, I don’t particularly think it matters WHAT she is doing that is so shameful, merely that it is and her father therefore thinks it’s appropriate for him to control the behavior. However, in context, it is most likely ~sleepin around~ (I was gonna say getting trashed and sleeping around but…they’re dwarves! Surely booze is equal opportunity!)
Of course I have no problem seeing it as a simple legend that, like Pewter said, also hurts the father (if in fact he was duped and did not intend for his daughter to become a rock) and merely explains the origins of hearthstones. However, the story itself informs the player how dwarves feel about children, or at least culturally how they are expected to.
Posted at September 15, 2010 on 12:09am.
7
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
@Charles – I still owe you some comments on your fab Le Guin/Lewis articles. I understand what you mean about the onus being on them – we have lots of fabulous characters that do impress us, and that we do care about, but it often seems as though they are disregarded for the ‘characters of the moment’. e.g. Malfurion, Varian, Garrosh etc are clearly the ‘leads’ of the player factions now.
I think it’s further complicated by our tendency as an audience to want our heroes to be Heroes. Right now, perhaps, they are too much like the obstacles put in the way of heroes in a regular fantasy setting. Which would be fine if we as players were really centre stage, but we’re not. We get to play in this playground and watch the story unfold, but we can’t change it. I’ve always wondered if they ever take into account how many times x boss is killed or how many do x quest to influence their future writing.
As a world it’s not particularly internally consistent. It’s very much cartoon writing and cartoon world building, but at the same time there are incredible amounts of stories and characters and content to get through. I also feel that there are some talented writers on the team, but I wonder how direction is really chosen.
@Rades – Again, this is not to say that sons don’t embarrass their fathers, but ‘Father Daughter’ relationships tend to take a very specific turn in fantasy and fiction in general. As a woman that was my immediate reading of it – a girl’s reputation in real life is very much tied up in her sexual activities, and a boy may be an ‘embarrassment’ because he’s jobless and drunk, and even indiscriminate etc, but the father-daughter dichotomy in fiction is very much tied up in ideas of chastity, sexuality, and fatherly protectiveness (so that he can give her away as pure). As much as I would love to read it as ‘gender neutral’, father-daughter relationships in such allegories rarely are. And this matches up with our only other ‘female dwarf’ story being that of Moira which is couched in terms of her relationship with her father as much as that of her husband.
@red cow – Some of what is being ‘read’ in Moira by the general audience is very different from what I read generally. That said the dwarfs are always somewhat ancillary to the stories of the humans and the elves, I’m hoping Cataclysm will change that somewhat – there’s more to Moira’s initial actions in ironforge than what I’ve posted here, and I’m looking forward to ‘discovering’ those quests when I have time. Part of the reason I focus on her is because Tyrande and Jaina seem to be taking a back seat to Varian and Malfurion in this expansion. I suspect part of it is expediency – storytelling can get very confused if overloaded with characters, but the emergence of Moira as a faction leader is very interesting. I just wish that Jaina and Tyrande could have their own voices back to balance out the ‘sinister’ female leads that Moira, Magatha and Sylvanas are.
Posted at September 15, 2010 on 9:45am.
8
Dàchéng at http://casualnoob.blogspot.com
I think you’re being a little ungenerous to Moira’s father Magni, by saying “Moira is a person who had the love of her life murdered indirectly by her father”.
Be fair! We adventurers discover that she had been ambushed and kidnapped by the Dark Iron dwarves and held prisoner by Emperor Dagrun “under some sort of powerful thought altering spell” according to Kharan Mighthammer, the captain of her guard; and Magni asks us adventurers that “You must rescue my dear daughter, Moira!”. Those are the words of a loving father (one can read the quest chain starting at http://www.wowhead.com/quest=4341 ).
And don’t try to pretend that, when we set out to save her, we are “assured by Magni that her words and loyalty to Dagrun are driven by an enchantment”; we told him that in the first place! Magni is not hiding something from us or trying to distort the truth, which is what your reportage hints. We told Magni that, reporting what Kharan had told us.
At the end of this chain, when he realizes that his daughter is staying in Blackrock depths, of course he is “visibly upset”. What loving father wouldn’t be? But he didn’t in any way “cast his daughter off” or “disown his heir” as you suggest. I’d be suing you for libel, if I were him!
Secondly, you suggest that Moira is an “‘embarrassing’ daughter”. I agree with you that she is a cause of “heartache and tragedy”, but I found no evidence of embarrassment on Magni’s part.
Caveat: I’m talking only from my knowledge of events before the Cataclysm. I don’t know what Magni does after that.
P.S. Kharan Lighthammer reckons that the ambush (in which he, Moira, and her guards were taken) was as a result of inside information. As yet we don’t know who the informer was. We can be pretty sure it wasn’t Kharan, as he ended up in a prison cell in the bowels of the Blackrock Depths. The guardsmen were executed (in the original version of the quest, though currently it simple says they were “captured”. See http://svn2.assembla.com/svn/eWoWProject/eWoW.Scripts/scripts/npctext.scp and search for “we were captured”). Who betrayed them?
Posted at September 15, 2010 on 2:54pm.
9
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
@Dà chéng – I don’t know that I’m being unfair by focusing on Moira’s point of view. I don’t have a problem with Magni as a character (he’s rather adorable) but this is an article about Moira. Yes, he loved her (and so we assume the Innkeeper loved his Daughter too), and yes it is reasonable that he wants to save his kin. This is not a critique on Magni at all, it’s all about Moira.
On the Enchantment sense – we are told of the enchantment by Kharan, and Magni is (for obvious reasons) very willing to believe that she is enchanted rather than run off with the son of Sorcerer Thane Thaurisan. Understandably so. (Again here, we see the idea that the idea that Moira has been mind controlled and raped is considered where the idea that she is headstrong and chosen to go and do a politically dangerous and embarrassing thing is not considered by Kharan OR Magni.)
On ‘embarrassment’ there’s a reason I put it in single quotes, as I’m talking in the context of how a daughter’s sexual conduct is often taken as a reflection on a family as a whole. While Magni may not be feeling ‘mundane’ embarrassment in the sense you might when walking in on someone having sex, her defection is a ‘political embarrassment’ for the royal house. Mostly my use of the word is referring to Keelin
No where did I suggest that this situation is not a cause of heartache for him, or that he did not love his daughter.
On the topic of Magni disowning his heir – Magni did declare that her son would never rule Ironforge in Legends 5. As Fenran is apparently his heir, he has disowned him.
As for the ambush, if you actually read what I wrote I mention that Moira herself is one of only a few possible candidates for the inside job of the ambush.
Posted at September 15, 2010 on 3:10pm.
10
Thogrum at http://www.chargefirst.blogspot.com/
Finally, someone else who is interested in the inner working of one of Azeroth’s oldest races. I my charachter is a dwarven warrior, who has served Magni through the Second and Third War, fought alongside Brann and Mauradin in the War in Northrend, and finally returned home. Perhaps to do a little fishing, and maybe pursue my love of archeology and history when, to my suprise, I come to find out that my King is dead, his disowned daughter is sharing his throne with another long distant clan of dwarves in the halls that have been Bronzebeard since the end of the War of Three Hammers!
From a RP perspective, how does an old dwarven soldier, and a well respected champion of Ironforge take this? Cautiously, I think. My loyalties lie to Ironforge, and it’s greater good is my purpose, but this new development bears watching. I have suspected for a long time that the Dark Irons may not be ‘all bad’ as mentioned above, and there is more going on here than would meet the eye. It’s not a coup de tate, nor a hostile takeover…perhaps the reunification of the dwarven people?
Is the child truly the heir to the Anvilmar legacy? I do hope Blizzard continues to work on this aspect of the lore!
Posted at December 26, 2010 on 4:20pm.