Warning: I don’t know how long this post is going to get. One of the things that inevitably pops up in feminist discussions in general is ‘what about the men’. Either it is a criticism cast at the whole idea of male privilege, or it is a criticism at the feminist tactic of shutting down male commentators, or it’s pointing out that men are hurt by the Kyriarchy too, and are also the recipients of sexism and prejudice. Generally my posts are about the marginalised perspective, so while posts from people outside the marginalised group are welcome, they often make what I would call beginner mistakes.
In this case, it’s my fault because I’ve gone straight from neutral Elemental Shaman Space to Feminist Space and never really laid out the groundwork for discussion. I presume concepts and knowledge that I have are common for my readers. I shouldn’t expect commentators who come to this blog to agree with everything I say, but at the same time if I try to help every one through the concept of privilege, or spend my time debating every feminist critique I’m not going to have time to actually write any more posts (and there are a lot of criticisms. Feminism isn’t the one true way to ‘enlightenment’, and it is entrenched in the language of women who are straight, white, western and academic, and that is a big problem for the movement.)
So, in the mean time here are some quick resources for readers who come to this blog and want to know more about feminism (or about how they can interact with feminism.) Also good if you don’t want to wait for me to answer. Feminist discussions can get very heated, and critiques of feminism are very hostile and constant as well, and both extremes are unwelcoming to the other end of the spectrum.
- Geek Feminism Wiki: Resources for Men
- Especially this great post from the F word
- If you have critiques, then Feminist Critics is a good space for you, although a lot of the comments make assertions that I am not happy with.
- And then there is Finally, a Feminism 101 Blog (let me know if you’re having trouble finding something in particular)
- Geek Feminism vs Mainstream Feminism
Weren’t we talking about men?
Yes. I got sidetracked. The above is just an addendeum/information. This post prompted by an excellent discussion over at The Bossy Pally. I’m hoping we will get some male bloggers to talk about male specific issues within World of Warcraft, because in terms of the way Kyriarchy hurts men, and men’s rights I am an ally.
So how do my male readers feel hurt (if at all) by the sexism and prejudice they encounter in WoW, and how the game depicts men, both on the small ‘quest’ level and the overall narrative? What issues do you think the game (or gaming) gets wrong, what could it do better?
(While this is an open discussion, I will not be approving comments that choose to bash women or spend time critiquing what feminism gets wrong about men. Let’s keep the conversation on men and by men, without it becoming at the expense of women. Please keep in mind that some commenters may not be cisgendered or heterosexual.)
Also if you decide to blog about this, that’s even better than commenting, and I’ll list the responses here.
Blog Responses (oldest first)
Our society then becomes a little more complex. Instead of having a situation where men are the dominant group over women we can see other statuses used to stratify society. Do all men relate to women the same? Do all men relate to men the same? Is the dominant group internally stratified or are all men on the same playing field?
- Man Cards @ 2fps
In most cases, the game treats male and female players just the same. There’s a brief hint of difference in the way Sergra Darkthorn treats male and female characters, where she is supportive of female ones and warns male ones not to underestimate her, but that doesn’t seem to me to be a bad thing – it’s realistic. She operates in a very macho environment and she’s fighting fire with fire.
- So let’s talk about men in World of Warcraft @ Fail PUG!
Even if you take out the “not evil” clause, which opens things out a lot the biggest male figures in Lore are still warriors or warrior-themed hybrids, the most obvious example of this being the Lich King himself. Despite the fact that his entire army is built around the work of mages, priests and scientists, Arthas himself remains a resolutely martial figure. None of this nancy-boy necromancy, nerdy plage-crafting or girly book learning for Arthas, no sir – like an undead Chuck Norris he delivers a roundhouse kick to the frozen wastes of Northrend and bam, a legion of Frost Dragons rises up out of the ice. Kapow.
- What about the MENZ? @ Righteous Orbs
Maybe it’s simply because I am a female, and I prefer to study things that are foreign or novel to me (which is why I get such a kick out of British TV), but I was much more interested in the way sexism negatively affects men. Because it does, and to say it doesn’t is to be just as blind as someone who says that all women who complain about sexism are making mountains out of molehills.
- Masculinism is not a word @ MissMedicina (note, this is in response to Chas’ post above, not to this post)
Not only are the peons in the Valley of Trials portrayed as stupid, low-lives, they are abused for sleeping on the job, a label that describes them as lazy. Let’s not forget what seems to be everyone’s favorite quote from the peon “Me not that kind of orc!” Said after being clicked with the hand (read: touched) by the player multiple times. The way the peon proclaims it is almost as in self-defense, as if worried that they will be labeled as homosexual if someone sees the player “touching” them.
- World of Warcraft and the Traditional “Man” @ Pheshamanal
A Trend I’ve noticed in the comments is the notion that discrimination against women and discrimination against some sorts of men somehow “cancel out” – that the fact that I feel unrepresented by male avatars and NPCs somehow balances the fact that many women feel unrepresented by female avatars and NPCs. That was very much not my intent, and I thought I would look at this in more detail and explain why I think it’s very important not to go from “patriarchy hurts men too” to “there is no patriarchy”.
- Menz Again: A follow up post @ Righteous Orbs
I also believe that the childish nature of male gnomes also contributes to their infantilism as well, despite the fact that most of them have beards that make them look otherwise. The race as a whole suffers from this due to misinterpretation of their eccentricity, that they treat their inventions like childish toys, or that their pursuit of knowledge is based on childish curiosity, rather than for more mature selfish gain like the other races.
- Gnomes, Nerds and Kyriarchy @ Frost is the New Black
So, just as female gamers have to fend off the inevitable questions about what we may look like, when we speak on Vent or apply to a guild or mention our first names – male gamers have to deal with the inevitable, enduring stereotype that they don’t have any friends, rarely leave the house, are unkempt and/or unlucky in love and this can possibly lead to them becoming defensive about having a hobby that they truly enjoy or can make them more sensitive to perceived threats to their masculinity.
- Snips and Snails and Worgen Pup Tails @ Stories of O
In most role-playing games, the character you play uses the same basic model regardless of what class it is, and as Chas noted, they’re invariably well-build musclemen if male, or “sexy” if female. Naturally there are exceptions: I don’t think female orcs, trolls or tauren (or even dorfs) in WoW are supposed to be “sexy”, and apparently Blizzard’s artists consulted real actual women when designing the Horde females.
- Class Body @ Ostensibly WoW







1
Jen at http://www.storiesofwow.com
Not a man, and as unbothered by many of the ‘male-discriminating’ stuff as by many of the ‘female-discriminating’ stuff, but one thing I don’t like is male human avatars. I can’t believe a big muscley human is a mage… it just doesn’t fit. I think it actually annoys me more than stuff like skimpy armor and anorexic belves.
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 12:19pm.
2
Vok at http://unrealrealities.com
Ok, I’m going to try and step very lightly here because no doubt I’ll going to put my foot in it a little. Remember, if I say something that can be interpreted in two ways, and one of them is offensive or insulting, I meant the other way.
I have difficulty understanding Feminism. I do not believe it’s because I’m more “privileged” (a term I am not at all comfortable with), but because the portral of men does not bother me. Take WoW as the example. I could be upset that all the men are buff as (can you think of a fat male is wow?), or that all the men are either heroic self sacrificing goodies or insane self absorbed bad guys (is there no middle ground?) but I don’t care. I’m NOT buff, but I LIKE being buff in WoW. It’s part of the reason I play.
IRL I am a quiet opinionated about the perception of men in our world. In Australia 1 in 3 women will get breast cancer. 1 in 2 men will get prostate cancer. Yet 10 times (!!!) the funding is available for breast cancer research. The number one killer in men aged 18-25? Suicide. Funding for mens mental health? HALF of that available for post-natal depression ALONE.
I HATE maternity leave. Why is it not paternity leave? Give the choice I would stay home and raise my children, not my wife. A recent survey showed that Australian men are working 10 hours a week more than 20 years ago, are spending 10 hours more doing housework and spending 8 hours more with their children. Women in Australia are doing 3 hours less house work, working 2 hours more on average and spending 6 hours less with their children.
Not letting a woman in the gym is sexist, having a women on gym is empowering.
But I’m waaaay off topic. Is it present in WoW? Yes, it definitely is. But to me, it’s just a game, it’s an escape from reality, not an extension of it.Does a quest where you rip out the heart of an ex-partner speak to domestic violence? The thought never occurred to me until I read about it. Does seeing a woman covered in bruises and cuts? Yes. I work in an environment where I see the results, physical and mental, of DV on a daily basis and I see no correlation at all.
So, in answer to the question I guess, what sexism may or may not exist in WoW, were I to know about it, would unlikely bother me. We could all be forced to play female character because the men are to weak to fight in this world and I would not think it sexist, it’s just the world we play in…
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 12:52pm.
3
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
Hi Vok. This is specifically a discussion about men in world of warcraft, and not why women are hypocritical etc etc, or whether sexism against women does or does not exist in the opinion of men. Your post is stating your opinion clearly, but it is veering towards contrast and criticism of how women/feminist feel about representations and issues of women, and that is something I’d like commenters to avoid (although I understand you included the statistics there for emphasis, and were not implying that breast cancer shouldn’t receive funding.)
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 12:56pm.
4
elye
I wouldn’t say hurt, more embarrassed; to see such behaviour going on , some players abstract sexism continues to surprise me, but also the women who either put up with it all be it begrudgingly , or twist this prejudice for their own gain are both equally worrying .
The first causes the second , and the only people I’ve seen who buck this trend are incredibly strong girls I remember one who’s attitude to the usual cat calls / goading was to subtly provoke their behaviour trap them in a corner and beat them to death with their own awkwardness.
In the long term the only solution would be if male WoW players got out more, I like to imagine that certain behaviour is down to them having next to zero female contact that’s outside of their family, making them so social awkward that the only behaviour they are capable is that of a cave dweller.
I’m not making excuses for this but if there were more consequence as a way to tackle this sort of behaviour especially considering the anonymity given to players in wow, currently the only regulation is that of guilds society as a one type “ generalised as geeky” male dominated and lazy plus often outside the remit of blizzard control.
Most of the behaviour that female players have to put up with is close to harassment, from the simple to the ridiculous, but it’s not just limited to female…
Every time a female guild member of ours talks on vent she gets remarks by whisper some new recruit or someone who didn’t already know asking if she’s really a girl , a young person or gay.
this must obviously matter to them ,or they wouldn’t ask just accept it.
That same wow playing friend of mine has actually had applications for high end guilds shot down, just because she’s a she .
* reproduced with her permission*
“apologies for the language and typo’s I have pasted as it was posted on her application. ”
You can’t be a good tank. Your gear is terrible, your application sucks. Unfortunately you fit well into my player mould of girls cannot play Warcraft. I know I am a bastard, I’m a cunt, I’m ginger, I’m (insert horrible word here). I do just tell it how it is.
We are looking for a holy priest, but I need a holy priest that I can put some half decent trust in to keep the raid alive, that I can put in charge of dispelling diseases on LK without killing players…I don’t think I’d be able to put that trust in you I’m afraid.
Application denied. Good luck in your search for a guild
The only backlash to this was when it was posted on the guild forums, insecure males laughed female wow players were disgusted and equality suffered.
Single sex guilds aren’t the answer, like single sex schooling I believe it just makes boys continue to act … like boys , its up to the community to deal with it …
The wow community Really needs to grow up and move out of their parents.
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 1:09pm.
5
Jen at http://www.storiesofwow.com
I don’t know the situation, but it sounds to me like a bad player who happened to be a girl. That’s what this quote says at least: “Your gear is terrible, your application sucks. Unfortunately you fit well into my player mould of girls cannot play Warcraft.”
The way I read it, she had bad gear and she wrote a bad app, so she was declined. The GM (or whoever wrote the decline post) was sexist, so he thinks all girls have bad gear and no skill. However, I don’t think this qualifies as “declined for being a girl”. It sounds like “declined for being a bad player and as a result ‘confirming’ someone’s idea about girls”. There might be more to it than that, but I guess we won’t know the details.
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 1:44pm.
6
Jen at http://www.storiesofwow.com
(sorry for the offtopicness…)
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 1:45pm.
7
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
Hmm, yes, if we could keep it on topic rather than making the post about whether or not someone is being sexist towards women, that would be awesome
*flagrantly tests out new commnet feature at the same time*
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 1:56pm.
8
elye
sheesh I really should have written that in word , with spell check , re-reading it now its not in a 2 inch by 4 inch box its full of typo’s and bad grammar.
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 1:16pm.
9
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
If you want to repost (and maybe think a bit more about what the discussion question is specifically asking at the same time) I can delete your old comment. That’s also a good point about the box size, I shall have to fix that. (Although on my screen it’s the width of the page…hmmmm)
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 1:20pm.
10
red cow at http://laurabroad.blogspot.com/
IDK if you are interested from comments from not-men about this (since you said for men by men, and if so please delete this!) but one thing that really irritates me is when guys and gals alike rib on male players with emasculating language. Of course for these insults to work we have to agree on some assumptions about what is manly or masculine. So guys are called gay, girly, weak, or whipped. It seems to be a very narrow window where a guy can behave properly, lest he be associated with things society deems as lesser (in the first 3). If you identify as a man, there you go, you are one. It’s ridiculous to suggest that a man is not, or less, for some non-typical behavior, and even worse so if those insults are the first to come out when people go to cut down a guy for non gender related reasons. For “whipped”, I get that sometimes guys may make jokes about how their wife wears the pants, or they are whipped and do housework or cook or what-have-you, that seems so dismissive of men’s abilities. You aren’t a cave-dwelling ogre, you are a human being capable of keeping your life and house in order! (Also, this does not make you a special snowflake if you do it ><)
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 2:16pm.
11
2ndnin
The guild leader sounds like he turned down a bad player with a bad app.
I suppose in relation to this we have to look at various categories of issu
es.
Avatars:
Male avatars are generally fantasy idealised versions of men.
Male clothing choice is restricted with almost capability to show variation in shirts etc.
NPC
Male npcs show little to no character advancement in the story.
Male npcs represent all of the big bads.
Male npcs are generally one dimensional.
Npcs need donation of clothing, it’s not skimpy it’s just not there.
Quests
If someone can screw up, a guy did it.
Mass murder is normally gender neutral or male mobs.
Silly
Vapid or idiotic sounding voice tracks.
Instances
No strong male guides. Best is brann who seems to trigger every single trap known in wow.
Just hanging around being incompetent (anub, kael, arthas, marrowgar, professor).
Demons
Female demons are sexualised and empowered.
Male demons are whiny and blustering (I would kill you, if I could).
There are probably more issues, a lot of these are very broad. In general like with the concepts behind male privilege men are assumed to be incompetent or one dimensional. Illidan became lord of Outland… and sat around doing nothing. Vashj’s plan was under way, while kael’thas sat in his space ship (technically overseeing the mana forges I assume but not tied into them). Female leaders get less play but actually seem well rounded as people.
Male sexualisation and lack of customisation, to even see a shirt we have to strip, wtb midriff and collar so the slot makes sense.
Our instance guide seems highly competent and geeky, but clumsy and random. He triggers every defense mechanism as he rushes in.
People wise lots of male idiots, lots of nice guys, but you only hear of the bad because the nice are quiet. Expectations to conform to society or oppose anti-female sexism (or be a woman hating dick / donkeyhole who abuses women |most of the time it is apathy, being a defender of everyone does get tiring and wearying over time| with no reverse expectations – men should stand up for themselves…). Macho-culture, expectations on being able to tank, being gay/effeminate for healing. Lots of standard stuff I suppose. It’s largely true that men will move mountains to get noticed by women (hetero beta/alpha males). On their own men tend to use insults in a friendly way to each other and form vertical hierarchies, there isn’t really much intermale conflict within the hierarchy but lots between hierarchies. Men do open up about feelings and such like but only with friends and away from women (who are seem to want the alpha male type and reinforce male hierarchies).
One of the most interesting reads on this was an American experiment where a woman dressed as a man for a year and got involved in male culture. Self made man by Norah Vincent.
There are also issues of male invisibility and issues around prison and the legal system. Generally men might be on top but they are also the bottom and there is very little help if you fail in society as a man.
That’s off hand, can probably refine a lot of this. The major issue for guys is likely that we are the default, we are invisible and we are expendable.
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 3:30pm.
12
2ndnin
Responding to myself to expand. I am going to state that most of this stuff doesn’t bother me personally however I can see how it would have an effect on people. I got bullied as a kid so learning to let stuff roll off your back is an important survival trait so I won’t judge whether it affects others or not.
Avatars:
Male avatars are generally fantasy idealised versions of men.
- Standard fantasy trope alongside the chainmail bikini and the voluptuous and curvaceous women. Boys are socialised to want to be sexually attractive to women, the 6 pack, the model like looks etc. While boys do not seem to be as overtly told by society to adhere to the model life I believe that there is a lot of subconscious drive towards this model. Making people see the only acceptable male roles as strong, well muscled, arrogant etc is a bad situation to be placed into. The males that break this are ones like the orc peons or human peons (male only) who are portrayed as doing manual labour and sounding less intelligent than even Varian Wrynn.
Male clothing choice is restricted with almost capability to show variation in shirts etc.
- Reinforces the societal view that men wear very little in terms of plumage. Women may be criticised for their outfits, or stared at in the male gaze however there is no option for men, to step outside of the norm is to become “effeminate” and punished by both men and women. Having stepped outside of the norms personally for a rocky horror night I can say that anecdotally men tend to find the idea of a man stepping outside of the norm funny and will stare, scorn, then quickly just accept the fact while women will tend to stare, deride and simply question your masculinity for far longer. It is purely anecdotal but from my experiences men are not enforced as men by men if you are willing to accept the position yourself, while women will attempt to put you back into the mould irrespective of your belief in yourself.
NPC
Male npcs show little to no character advancement in the story.
- We saw even Tirion Fordring minimally advance in character throughout the plot. At all times the plan seems to be to attack, advance and move forward even if it costs great numbers of lives. The old trope that it cost 100,000 men’s lives to move General Hauge’s liquor cabinet 6″ closer to Berlin seems to be the ruling theme in male characters drive.
Male npcs represent all of the big bads.
- All the strife in the world can ultimately be tied back to men… I am sure this is harmful in many ways. As a kid growing up you might see men as being responsible for a lot of good but then if we are also responsible for all of the evil then it doesn’t really balance out.
Male npcs are generally one dimensional.
- Hulk smash. Jaina may cry and betray part of her strength but at least she is shown to have emotions beyond becoming large and green.
Quests
If someone can screw up, a guy did it.
- Are there any of the catastrophes of WoW caused by women or is it simply men that bungle. Plays into the tropes of the Simpsons, Family Guy etc where the man bungles and the woman saves the day because the reverse is sexist…
Mass murder is normally gender neutral or male mobs.
- Other than the harpies have we ever gone and deliberately killed 5,10,15 or more female characters simply because someone asked us to.
Silly
Vapid or idiotic sounding voice tracks.
- Applies to both genders, but seriously can we have some intelligent sayings please.
Instances
No strong male guides. Best is brann who seems to trigger every single trap known in wow.
- The men bungling trope. It is so common in society we get the man creates situation by pressing button…
Just hanging around being incompetent (anub, kael, arthas, marrowgar, professor).
- Many of the female characters in WoW actually appear to be competent in their defences or in their actions. Lady Deathwhisper is indoctrinating recruits, Vashj was commanding the extraction facility, Marrowgar was stalking an empty room.
Demons
Female demons are sexualised and empowered.
- Can we have an incubus please…
Male demons are whiny and blustering (I would kill you, if I could).
- In many fantasy universes demons might be bound, but there is no doubt that if that demon got free it would be a serious danger to the caster. The felguard comes the closest however is rather whiny in his blustering and doesn’t feel like a threat, the blueberry, well frankly it sounds like he plans to maybe bore me to death if he gets free. I would love to see some demons actually threatening us, feeling powerful and making the lock actually feel like a demonic summoner risking their life for the power of the demon rather than calling this demonic squirrel from the nether. The imp is fine, it is meant to be a low level low power demon, but the blueberries are shown in other places to actually be powerful.
Posted at August 19, 2010 on 6:55pm.
13
Maker
To be quite honest, I’ve never really paid all that much attention to the role of gender in WoW. (Male player. Can’t you tell from the intro?)
One thing I’ve been sorely disappointed with is that they did nothing worthwhile with Brunnhildar Villar. I had hoped that there be a bit of story with the ladies. A matriarchal society would’ve been very interesting and could’ve opened up some interesting story lines. Instead, we use them to gain access to the Sons of Hodir and to get the White Polar Bear mount. If you’re not interested in the mount, then you have even less of a reason to pass by their village.
P.S. I loved Argent Confessor Paletress. At the very least for the varying fights. Wish she had been promoted to the raid as well. Would’ve been a much better boss than any of the current ones. Raids having to adjust on the fly to a given old world boss’s unique mechanics would’ve been amazing and probably quite frustrating at the same time. (I digress…)
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 7:58pm.
14
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
Well, specifically I’m asking you what you think about the representations of male gendered characters, and expectations of what it is to be a man in world of warcraft
Posted at August 18, 2010 on 8:43pm.
15
Rob
First, I’d like to thank Pewter for the work she’s put into this blog. I’ve only recently started reading (in the last month or so) but I can say everything I’ve read has been interesting and given me lots to think about. So, thanks again. /salute
Normally I’m content to read and leave it at that. However, since you explicitly asked for comments from men on this issue, I figured I’d toss in my 2 cp, for all that it’s worth.
I think the gender stereotypes that WoW presents of masculinity and maleness is reflective of the society it’s created in, with all the good, and bad, that comes with it. Despite it’s accomplishments as a game and story, I find it to be pretty conservative in adhering to the standard stereotypes. For example the burly, blustering, male military leader (hello Garrosh and Varian) is over used and annoying. It would be nice to see them try something new with the setting, characters, and stories but I think they are constrained by their success. People, rightly or wrongly, come to this genre with certain preconceptions. For them to drastically depart from the lowest common denominator of the genre would eat into that success. Unfortunately I think a large part of their strategy at this point is to keep feeding that success, which means staying safe with a lot of things, including gender stereotypes.
As far as expectations of what it is to be a man in WoW, I really don’t feel any. The quests an story lines come prepackaged with their inbuilt biases, but the situation is so rigid, and in most cases flat out binary (you either do the quest or you don’t). I’ve found my strategy in dealing with quest lines like that is to either just treat it mechanically (thus breaking any immersion the developers were trying to achieve) and get it done for the meta game rewards (achievements) or opt out of the experience all together.
Since I’ve been playing (and paying for) this game for the last 5 years, I can’t really say that they bother me excessively. For all that they are tiring, eye roll inducing, and even wince evoking at times, they aren’t enough to cause me to quit and there is enough good in what Blizzard has built to at least call it a draw, if not tip the scales in favor of fun.
I hope this answered the question. Reading back it seems pretty rambling.
Posted at August 19, 2010 on 12:58am.
16
RimeCat
The major problem in WoW, from a male perspective, regarding the representation of masculine ideas or traits is that the design team seems to be sexually insecure. Inflammatory, I know, but I still vividly recall the blast from the community team during TBC beta that only gay men would want to play the original BElf characters. They were too weak, not nearly steroidal enough. Of course anyone who has done any reading on the topic realizes that the standard male model in WoW is actually closer to the homosexual body ideal than the heterosexual ideal.
So, since I opened with the models, let’s stay there. The only male models are stupidly muscular. Aesthetically I dislike the design. It is unrelentingly puffy and overblown. That I have no other choices is annoying. That does not rise to the level of damaging, despite the number of times I’ve considered sex changing my Shaman just so I don’t have to look at the idiotic male Draenei shoulders. Seriously, how do they survive? They can’t even grasp a fishing pole in two hands. What is damaging about this is the impact on young, insecure and impressionable boys. Anyone who says a young boy does not look at the latest muscle star and feel insecure does not remember being 14 and certain that all the girls are laughing at his ‘wimpy’ body. Even among adults, who generally do not aspire to that body type, it can be off-putting; one of the seemingly genetic traits men carry is an incessant need to assess threat. The over-muscled yahoo is a physical and (perceived at least) sexual challenge. I have to wonder how much this is exacerbated by the WoW body image. After all, you scrawny kid, even your priest can press 350. Listen closely and you can hear the mutter of ‘wimp, wimp’ from the screen. Short take is the standard body image damage done to women by fashion magazines. Does this cause a similar effect? Better find a way, any way, to bulk up or you are going to be a nothing forever.
Oh, and reinforcing the body image and sexual orientation issue – look at the video posted on MMO Champion today, ‘The Day Deathwing Came’, and wait for the Orc to tell his tale. They spend time making the Orc a tough guy. Motorcycle, circle of ‘admirers’ and threats of massive physical violence to anything that gets in his way. His admirers? A female Orc, a female NElf, a female Human…and a male BElf. Juvenile and puerile humor is a charitable explanation. More of the designers insecurities in my opinion – let’s bash the gay guy and prove that we’re real men.
The more insidious problem is the lack of any nuanced approaches to male roles. I know, WoW is anything but nuanced but here they seem to have gone overboard. I cannot think of one male character in WoW who advises a considered, pragmatic approach to conflicts. Even if the only answer is to fight the WoW male only knows how to charge forward an smash his forhead against the problem until he or it collapses. Until they decided to destroy her character in the IC instances I always thought that Jaina was the only leader the alliance had who was worth a damn. She at least had some concept of subtlety and using all the resources at her disposal. The male head of SI:7, the spy master of the alliance, only seems able to understand brute force and street brawling. Another good example is Velen. Wise, ancient and subtle. His direction to the characters during the Draenei starting quests? ‘Guh, why dons’t youse guys go break stuff and kill Blood Elves? Yeah! Dat’s a great plan.’ Why would they design such shallow leaders with such obvious intellectual limits? The same reason that the Hollywood WW2 films from the 1950′s depict the German military leader as cultured and intellectual while the American officer is a good old boy from the boondocks or a kid from the streets. And not one who gained an education despite an underprivileged background. No, they retain the stereotypical worst traits of their origin culture. The only way to be a man is to put your fist in someone’s face. All that learning? It’ll make you into a girl.
The final issue I’ll raise is the lack of male caretakers. In Stormwind the orphans have matrons, no patrons. The same is true in Shattrath. The kids being led around SW have women guiding them. I can think of no example where a male character is a nurturing figure. Even in Darnasus, the female lead is concerned with the good of her people, the male lead with insulting the characters (have to establish dominance) and complaining that he has the better ideas. It fits the previous pattern: the only way to be a man is to be a tough guy who is only concerned with direct confrontations. Caring for people? Leave that to the girls. And I do understand that this (most of the points actually) cuts both ways, but you asked about the portrayal of male characters.
This is a shallow and damaging way to view the world and a man’s place in the world. Assuming a marginally functional childhood and some level of effective parenting or mentoring it is stupid to assume that all men in Azeroth (and Outland it seems) have never developed any intellectual or social capability beyond ‘me hit you in the face, then me laugh’. But that is where WoW leaves us. There is no variation, no individuation. The perfect totalitarian social view, everyone is the same and all questions have a single answer.
Posted at August 19, 2010 on 2:18am.
17
Borsk at http://borsked.com
Finally home, now I can comment on this! I’ve been reading a lot of things you’ve posted over the past week or two and it certainly is thought provoking, though it’s a topic that I have no perspective on therefore I find it hard (impossible) to formulate a real opinion on it.
However, this is a little closer to my wheel house so to speak.
Frankly, I’ve never thought about it (male roles in WoW). Even when I do sit down and really ask myself “what does this mean to me” I get nothing. It doesn’t bother or excite me that every male character model is buff, mage or not, warrior or not, human or not. It doesn’t bother me that 90% of the villains are male, nor does it make me happy. It just is.
I’ve never rolled a female character, and never had a compulsion to, in this game or any previously (the, “I have to look at the back of this character for 5 hours” reason is stupid, they’re friggin pixels). I play an 8ft tall muscular blue alien in the game which is the opposite of my real life persona. The closest thing I’ve found to an in game representation of myself is Egan Stetman in StarCraft 2 and even that is too far to the nerd side.
I have enough problems in real life revealing that I even play games (not named Madden or Call of Duty) to worry that every human male looks the same and nothing like the average man I see in the office. What’s funny is that I receive (some of) the same indignation from WoW players when I tell them I’m a big sports fan and hockey player (blog post inc about that last bit).
It’s just a game to me.
I run a very tolerant guild where both males and females can feel comfortable. Gay males and females (sometimes couples), frat boys, old people young people, they all coexist. It’s all about creating the -environment- for a good community. If it doesn’t exist, it’s a fault of the leadership in my opinion.
Posted at August 19, 2010 on 2:55am.
18
gazimoff at http://www.manaobscura.com/
Right, where to begin?
Am I happy with how men are represented in Warcraft? Nope.
The chief heroes – the leaders, the main plot devices – are all shown to be testosterone fuelled meatheads that are more interested in waging war on anything and everything they can. As role models they’re kinda flat and uninteresting. When you expect something to go “RAAARGH” at every turn, it becomes samey.
If you look at characters that show a little bit of intelligence, you’ve got the same problem. Professor Putricide? Comedy raidboss and evil genius. Grand Apothecary Putress? Evil Genius. High Tinker Mekkatorque? Comedy faction leader. Ronin? One-dimensional Knaak creation.
So if you’re intelligent, you’re basically either evil and should be killed, or funny and should be laughed at. Or both.
Considering that men spend most of their childhoods being mocked (or worse) by their peers if they show the slightest bit of intelligence, it just seems to reinforce negative stereotypes.
Yes, it’s just a game. But more often than not games are a reflection of our society and culture. You can see that from the sheer number of pop culture references that Blizzard throw at the game.
Luckily, for every Garosh Hellscream there is a Gordon Freeman. If only there were more like him.
Posted at August 19, 2010 on 11:35am.
19
Windpaw at http://windpaw.wordpress.com
It’s interesting – I’d say the average male’s response to the (male) character models in WoW runs along the lines of…
“Dude…that Night Elf has killer forearms – I need to hit the gym…”
Or…
“WTF is up with those eyebrows – I mean RLY….”
Or…
“This guy sucks – imma change to a blood elf female.”
Now that I’ve generalized vigorously – let me do it some more!
I suppose if I had to look at the male characters in WOW and compare and contrast with say – *myself* – I’d wonder why I couldn’t be over 6 feet tall and packed with muscle. Does not being tall dark and handsome have negative effects on the average male in the Real World? Absolutely. But does that mean that the average guy (my demographic) feel like he needs to have an avatar that represents his own overwhelming lack of idealized masculinity?
Doubtful. I’d say the average slob (also my demographic) wouldn’t mind having some skinny/chubby avatar with no shoulders and a great big melon – but I’d say that for the most part none of them would play him. Why? Because the average joe comes to the game to escape his relationship with the dim world of average and for a while – to be bigger than life. To have muscles on their muscles. To have eyebrows with their own gravity. Because whether it’s right or not or healthy or not, every single guy out there probably wishes he could change something about himself to better fit his *own* perception of masculinity or beauty. To simply be someone or something else.
That we have to contend with societies vagaries when it comes to concepts of feminine or masculine beauty is reality. Most of us can probably reach just a little ways back into our own history and remember a place and a time where we weren’t someone else’s idealized vision of the perfect man or woman. The discovery of that fact probably hurt. It didn’t feel fair. If anything, Blizzard offers a world where everyone is so perfectly ridiculous looking that it almost makes a lot of us simply forget about it altogether.
I guess for the TL:DR crowd – I never really thought about how it made me feel. I simply chose my very first character based on how I *wish* I looked vs. how I really looked and then never bothered to look back.
Posted at August 19, 2010 on 11:48pm.
20
Thorsteinn
I know this isn’t directly related to the question at hand, but it’s kind of relevant …
It’s not that I feel actually hurt by the sexism in WoW (if only because I haven’t given it a lot of thought) or the portrayal of males in the world. But it gets a little embarrassing, sometimes, if I’m at work (I’m lucky enough to work in a place where idling on the internet is an acceptable way to pass the time, when there’s nothing going on) and watching something on YouTube that’s WoW-related. I’m just sitting there and then, with co-workers in the same room also watching, a female (of whatever race) in a chainmail or plate-bikini comes along. I don’t know why, but it feels a little embarrassing to be known to play a video game that shows women (and wo-elves, wo-orcs and dwarfettes) like that.
I know this doesn’t really have anything to do with how I feel about male portrayal in this game – but it was just a random thought that popped up while I was reading.
The only example of sexism that I, as a male, run into that I’ve noticed comes from other players. I play pretty much exclusively female characters. I don’t know why, it’s just something I’ve done in computer games since Ultima VI, when choosing a gender meant choosing a portrait (face only) and NPCs addressing you as “my lady” or “lady” instead of “my lord” or “sir”; the avatars were exactly the same for either gender.
So I get to run into two kinds of people: The folks that think I’m a woman (condescension, “girls suck at WoW”, sexual advances and that kind of stuff), and the folks that think there’s something wrong with a guy “pretending to be” a woman – the ones assume I’m either gay (“lol u wanna be girl? u a fag?”) or that I’ve some sexual reason for having a female character (“admit it your just looking at your toons ass and fapfapfap”).
Posted at August 20, 2010 on 8:53am.
21
3 am eternal
Now I don’t know if this is derailing, if it is please delete this comment and I will be going on my merry little way.
I am writing in response to eley and her complaint about guilds beeing excluding towards women.
I have to ask her, does she support womens’ right to exclusively chose whom they spend their leisure time with? In that case she has to extend the same privillige to guild masters. A guild is a decidedly private sphere where the laws of the public sphere no longer apply. The guild master is free to chose who is allowed in. Now I think eley is in her right to complain that women are not allowed. But it’s still the guild masters right to decide who he wants to spend his free time with.
Of course if eley does not think this way and is willing to start telling women that they are exclusionist and should stop being that when they decide that certain types of men are not allowed inside their private sphere, then I will be more and happy to start discussing excluionsim in world of warcraft guilds.
Posted at August 22, 2010 on 4:07pm.
22
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
There’s a difference between women deciding not to associate with men who have harassed them, or to make a safe, female friendly space, and men excluding all women from guilds because ‘all women are bad players and causers of drama’ (for example). So yes, this is a bit derailing. These safe, all-female guilds are rarely seen by men as guilds they have to get into for the sake of raiding in progression, so it is something of a moot point.
I think there is a difference between starting a guild and intending to make it a space where members can play free of harassment, and excluding a gender because supposedly ‘all of them’ are bad at playing and your own members are incapable of refraining from assholish behaviour towards other players.
Posted at August 22, 2010 on 4:50pm.
23
2ndnin
For the sake of arguement though Pewter, what difference does it make?
The GM makes a decision to create an all male guild because he feels that on average it is not worth dealing with the potential issues of having female members (on either side) or prefers the atmosphere of all male environment.
The individual woman makes a choice to avoid certain men or groups of men by joining an all female guild.
What is the difference here, both want a singular space. The fact that the all male guild has a higher likelyhood of being in a high progression environment doesn’t make a difference. Perhaps the all male environment is one in which casual insults are tossed around (fairly typical) but what difference does that make realistically if that is the environment they wish to be in. Don’t they get to choose to be around assholes and exclude who they wish because it is a private club?
Posted at August 22, 2010 on 11:38pm.
24
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
Personally I think it makes every difference when one gender has the majority control of the atmosphere in high level gaming. Again – no one here is demanding that every top end raiding guild accept women merely because they are women, or even that they shouldn’t decide to restrict membership to men only (Elye is actually saying the opposite to me, here, as she suggests single spaces aren’t the long term solution for anyone. Personally I feel that singular spaces are necessary for some individuals). What is under criticism is the ubiquity of the culture – the result being that it’s okay to bedisrespectful towards women, that it’s okay to insult a woman who participates in that environment, that it’s okay to sexually proposition her out of the blue, and that women have to ‘prove’ they can play in a way that men don’t have to. (Personally I have no problem with ‘mens clubs’ irl, for example, or the idea of going for a drink with the lads – women’s groups aren’t created so we can sit around and talk smack about men, and I wouldn’t want to be in a group of people that did. It’s where the two intersect and the culture that is created that is a problem for -both- genders.)
Maybe I should have hidden her comment, as it is somewhat derailing on this topic.
There is a difference between a singular space that reinforces a status quo that damages and excludes on a massive scale, and a singular space that is insulating from that status quo. In my opinion, anyways. You say it doesn’t make a difference, but I really think it does.
Posted at August 23, 2010 on 11:45am.
25
2ndnin
No I think you were right not to hide the comment, a men’s thread isn’t going to get as much traffic as another type of post simply because most men won’t notice or accept that there are issues and how they are affected. We are trained not to from childhood, the other side of male privilege is that men are effectively stunted in moving out from their own role.
Part of the issue with one gender having majority control of the atmosphere is that there are very few women in high end raiding guilds and those that are tend to “act like men” in that they are more focused on the raiding aspect itself rather than the atmosphere and the guild focus. Singular spaces can make this kind of focus and drive easier because it allows you to accept players from the larger group who are not socially mature or willing to be mature and respectful to the opposite gender without sacrificing much on quality of raider (there are simply more men playing WoW than women so a high end guild excluding women has less of an effect than trying to exclude men would assuming you can’t simply recruit from the whole pool).
On the insults, that is generally how all male environments work. Insults fly around like beer at a brewery but they are not meant hurtfully generally. A woman coming into this environment is likely to catch more than her fair share of the insults (same as anyone who is different from the norm) but I wouldn’t say that this is innately an issue because it is how groups of men work, you aren’t asking men to be nice to women you are asking them to change their whole social and organisational structures to make them more woman friendly.
Women having to prove themselves should be expected, again women come into “male spaces” as something outside of the norm and want acceptance into the group. The same proving of yourself happens to gamma type men in normal alpha/beta male hierarchies and to any beta male that steps outside of the expectations, they need to prove their rights to the space. A typical alpha or beta will get a free pass on the proving stage provided they don’t step outside of the expectations the group has put on them.
So the question then becomes how does an all male group get formed without being damaging? If men excluding women (for any reason) is damaging to them and their capability to play at high levels then how can it exist. At a similar side why can’t women simply create a high level guild at the progression level they want, no one gave Nihlium, Death and Taxes or Paragon a hand up the ladder, they formed and recruited with a purpose and made the purpose more important than the other issues.
Posted at August 23, 2010 on 2:55pm.
26
3 am eternal
So lets say, women who say ‘male nerds smell bad’ or ‘male engineers only want to talk about boring stuff, we don’t want to associate with them’, where would this fall? Under female right to chose her company anyhow she likes, or under prejudice?
Regarding all-female guilds, I fail to see the problem. World Of Warcraft isn’t real life, There is no social contract that forces anyone to socialize with someone they don’t want to socialize with.
Posted at August 22, 2010 on 5:06pm.
27
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
We’re not discussing a situation where that is the case and that’s kind of not the point of this post/discussion. This post is about how men are hurt by the societal norms and expectations perpetuated in warcraft by the game and by other men (and just not by us meany women.) There is no campaign to make every single guild out there have a female quota, and that’s not what Eley was talking about.
Posted at August 22, 2010 on 5:47pm.
28
3 am eternal
I answered a previous post, but if you judge this as derailing I will respect your opinion and leave the subject.
Posted at August 22, 2010 on 6:10pm.
29
Sven at http://failpug.blogspot.com
I’ve posted my thoughts here.
Posted at August 23, 2010 on 9:55am.
30
Oestrus at http://thestoriesofo.wordpress.com
Pewter, you have inspired me again!
I feel that whatever I could contribute to the conversation could veer into the direction you didn’t want the comments to go towards (nothing negative – just not wholly on topic, either) and I have to admit, I’m excited about the idea of writing about something from the man’s perspective.
Would you mind if I used your post for inspiration again and wrote something about this?
Posted at August 23, 2010 on 8:20pm.
31
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
Go for it. I may refrain from commenting because it’s a bit dangerous for me to try and get involved in -every- discussion about this stuff
I shall link it though.
Posted at August 23, 2010 on 10:09pm.
32
Chastity at http://www.righteousorbs.com
Woo! Linkbacks are love!
I’m embarrassed to note that I misspelled “plague” in the sample you quote, however…
Posted at August 25, 2010 on 11:36am.
33
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
haha. I can go in and put [sic] now, right?
I was really impressed with the way you dissected the topic, it was the sort of commentary I was hoping to read and hopefully will prompt some people to think about this stuff rather than dismiss or ignore it forever more
Posted at August 25, 2010 on 12:03pm.
34
Chastity at http://www.righteousorbs.com
I’ve felt really ambivalent about the reaction to the whole thing unfortunately. While people have been mostly overwhelmingly positive I’ve seen one too many replies along the lines of “Great post! This proves that there’s no such thing as sexism!”
I got into a particularly horrible ruck with 2ndnin about halfway down because he kept insisting that the concept of rape culture made no sense because men get raped too. I’m afraid I was rather insulting towards the end.
Posted at August 25, 2010 on 11:02pm.
35
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
I’m starting to get the ‘you’re fucking deluded’ blog pingbacks now. I’ve decided not to publish them because they really don’t add anything to the discussion we’re trying to have here (and exactly the sort of dismissive bullshit I get annoyed at.) It’s possible to disagree without being dismissive, or calling people people who object to the status quo ‘fucking deluded’.
Posted at August 26, 2010 on 9:10am.
36
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
Your comment was amazing. I have such a hard time articulating what I find wrong about his points, and he’s popped up in many comment threads and it is relieving to have someone articulate it so well.
Posted at August 26, 2010 on 3:21pm.
37
2ndnin
Chastity, given the benefits of fat, geek, outsider, intelligent and various other privileges I am used to insults so don’t worry, water and a ducks back as they say.
Also I wasn’t saying rape culture makes no sense, I was saying in the thread (about men) the concept needs to be expanded to account for the silencing effects on men. The effects it currently covers exist, what it needs though in this side of the debate is to encompass the aspects of society which it currently doesn’t. The concept itself is fine, it just needs to be more expansive (which I suppose would weaken it’s usage in pure feminist terms, but then if feminism is about equality they shouldn’t mind a weaker but actually encompassing term with specific sub-cultures reflecting the specific effects on groups).
I decided not to post any more in that thread given that no matter what I say you (through the feminist lens) will target the weakest part and parts I don’t explain so we will just butt heads. It was a men’s issue thread so I naturally assumed we would have a male focus (as feminist threads typically assume a female only focus) but that got me labelled as a misogynist. Cést la vie.
Posted at August 27, 2010 on 8:56pm.
38
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
The thing is you didn’t seem to be making it about ‘mens issues’, but about how feminism does a disservice to mens issues. Chas said many things to you that I’ve been figuring out how to say – I’m not the best at explaining myself when I’m angry. When you consider that someone who actually wants to talk about men’s issues sees misogyny in the way you want to talk about them, then perhaps you need to look at how you are approaching feminist and Men’s Rights discussions and managing to ding many a point on the feminist bingo card. People are getting annoyed at how you are repeating old mistakes rather than paying attention to the relevant things you do have to say. I got to a point where I didn’t bother to respond to your wall of text posts anymore because it honestly didn’t feel worth the effort.
Even your discourse on rape culture is taking digs at feminism ‘if feminism about equality’ – you think that’s not immediately going to make it about ‘feminism vs men’ as opposed to ‘about men’ then you’ve really got to rethink what you’re trying to achieve. Especially if you’re then going to turn around and say ‘but now you’re making it about the women!’ Rape Culture ALREADY includes the silencing effect on men, something Chas clearly delineated (and was pointed out in the feministe thread you linked to). You seem to have a personal axe to grind against feminist discussion in general (looking at your posts elsewhere) and you do not seem to be commenting in ‘good faith’ but to score internet points against those ‘nasty feminists who aren’t really about equality.’ Posting to defend Adam really kind of confirmed that for me.
I’ve been moderating your comments, but this is the last one of yours that will get through now.
Posted at August 28, 2010 on 2:12pm.
39
Miss Medicina at http://missmedicina.blogspot.com
I feel so honored that I made the list!
You’ve done such a great job keeping track of all this, and I’m really enjoying reading through everything you’ve compiled and authored. You’re the best!
Posted at August 25, 2010 on 5:26pm.
40
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
Your post is pretty damn excellent, I was very happy to be able to include some more in-depth discussion. So far the ‘responses’ have been pretty slow in coming in general, I suspect because men who have never had to think about it need a while to mull things over.
Posted at August 25, 2010 on 7:15pm.
41
2ndnin
I didn’t defend Adam’s PoV, I defended the individual who to me read as a much different situation than it read to Chastity.
It is hard to discuss these concepts though as a men’s issue because the minute you don’t include women you are considered a misogynist. Not being partially hostile to feminism is hard when we have had notable feminists making claims like “all men are rapists”. To interact with the movement you need to determine what kind of feminist you are engaging with and how they are going to take your points, which I will admit to failing in. I didn’t bother to assess either your or Chastity’s type of feminism before I discussed the subjects so I failed in communicating.
I am talking in good faith, the issue is that we have very different lenses on what we see in the world and how we interpret it and the actions of people within it. This isn’t an issue I think we can solve in this kind of public forum or even perhaps ever, the lenses we wear blinker us to what the other side is actually saying, and our life experiences inform us differently. I am actually just going to stop posting on those threads because all we are doing is going backwards and forwards on issues I think we all want to address but our approaches are different.
Posted at August 28, 2010 on 2:54pm.
42
Pewter at http://mentalshaman.com
It’s not that you didn’t include women, it’s that it dismissed women. There’s a difference, and I think it is one of the difficulties those that Men’s Rights Activists face, and a very hard thing to make any easier. As for that individual, well, I feel sorry for them getting stuck in the middle, but I think Chas is spot on with his criticisms of Adam’s post (and activism and advocacy in one area does not make dismissal and silencing okay in another area, which is what my problem with Adam’s attitude is.)
And yes – coming into a feminist discussion and presuming that the writer is a radfem, and that feminism is a hivemind is a big mistake. It’s one I made before I started engaging in feminism (ewww, those feminists are just anti-choice and they hate me for shaving my legs.) The messes that feminism has made are big, and need to be talked about, but a man attacking feminism on the basis of men’s rights is going to have an uphill battle if they think we all think alike
Posted at August 28, 2010 on 4:04pm.
43
Lily
@Vok – “I HATE maternity leave. Why is it not paternity leave?”
Cause you didn’t have the baby? Er…maybe it’s different in Australia, but in the US Maternity leave is a few week physical recovery period after having a child. *NOT* a long-term stay home and raise the kids thing. However, a lot of places actually do give paternity leave. My best friend has two kids, and both times her husband took a month + off work also.
Is it different in Australia? If not, then yeah…that’s why. You didn’t have the baby.
Posted at September 23, 2010 on 1:21am.